Landscape architecture must keep the advantage it’s gained due to its wide use of the knowledge of landscape which no other related disciplines have. Detailed landscape design, creation of the latest spaces—new landscapes, and use of characteristic, alive landscape material also as nature protection, landscape ecology, and regional landscape planning require both an ingenious and a scientific approach. The essential ability that landscape architects have, i.e. the potential of switching between concrete details and even global landscape interactions—enables them to realize different and sometimes better results than could be developed by architects, artists, urban planners, biologists, ecologists, and other colleagues when handling similar landscape problems.
The peculiar character of the architecture profession requires landscape architects to be conversant in both a good range of data from the sector of natural sciences and artistic creativity at an equivalent time. The dichotomy between art within architecture on the one hand and science on the opposite is usually quite clearly demonstrated during a broad range of our works. Landscape architects who call themselves land artists create art installations. It’s an ingenious act of expressing their understanding of the planet and not a process of solving spatial problems. On the opposite hand, there are many works done either by colleagues coming from “related disciplines” or by landscape architects who affect specific themes to such an extent that. It is simply impossible to supply a scientific and analytical overview of architecture with detailed and proper definitions of landscape architectural terms because there’s no such thing.
So as to try to do that the simplest thing would be to match several landscape architectural dictionaries in several languages from different countries and compare definitions. Last Words: a plus of architecture is its capability to unravel problems in what’s probably a broader range than the other related discipline. For that reason, landscape architects must be trained to master different working methods and techniques. Simply said, we must be creative once we run landscape design analyses and look for the simplest design solution and even be ready to present our projects in proper graphic mode.
To incorporate all the specified elements into the teaching process, school programs must be flexible enough to mix the creative character of the profession also as natural sciences. There’s no got to develop special techniques to show design. If the professional products are good (landscape designs), they need to leave a dialogue between all involved related disciplines, the public, and decision-making parties. For that reason, professional projects often contain diagrams and clear graphics that landscape architectural students can follow once they apply to understand the approaches to their own personal methods.